Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11547/1857
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSevi Genç, Gülin-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-11T13:07:28Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-11T13:07:28Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11547/1857-
dc.description.abstractEğitimde ilerleme iyi eğitilmiş öğretmen, öğretmen eğitimi ise iyi planlanmış mesleki çalışma programları ile mümkündür. Günümüzde uygulanan mesleki çalışma programlarının ise etkililikten uzak olduğu görülmektedir. Bu araştırmada; ilkokul ve ortaokullarda görev yapan öğretmenlerin, sene başı ve sene sonunda gerçekleştirilen mesleki gelişim seminer çalışmaları hakkındaki görüşlerini ortaya çıkarmak ve Ar-Ge çalışmalarına ışık tutmak amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmanın evrenini İstanbul ili, örneklemini Bahçelievler ilçesinde bulunan ilkokul ve ortaokullar oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın modeli nitel ve nicel birlikteliğinde karma bir yöntemdir. Nitel bölümde, 65 katılımcıyla yüz yüze yapılan, yarı yapılandırılmış “Mesleki Çalışmaları Değerlendirmeye Yönelik Öğretmen Görüşme Formu” kullanılarak elde edilen veriler içerik analizi ile değerlendirilmiştir. Nicel bölümde ise, araştırmacılar tarafından hazırlanmış, güvenirliği 0,95 olarak bulunan ve 459 katılımcıya uygulanmış “Mesleki Gelişim Seminer Çalışmalarını Değerlendirme Envanteri” ölçeğinden elde edilen veriler frekans ve yüzde değerleri, aritmetik ortalama, T-testi ve one way ANOVA testi kullanılarak çözümlenmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları 8 boyutta değerlendirilmiştir. Amaca uygunluk boyutunda, hizmet yılı değişkenine göre 20 yıl ve üzeri görev yapan öğretmenler lehine anlamlı bir farka rastlanmış, çalışmaların “amacına ulaşmayan program” olduğu tespit edilmiştir. İçerik uygunluğu boyutunda çalışma içeriklerinin “yetersiz ve bilinen konuların tekrarı” olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Süreç uygunluğu boyutunda, yöneticiler ve 51 yaş üstü öğretmenler lehine anlamlı bir farka rastlanmış, sürecin “verimsiz ve zaman kaybı” olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Öğreticilerin uygunluğu boyutunda bekârlar lehine anlamlı bir fark görülmüştür. Yöntem ve tekniklerin uygunluğu boyutunda, erkeklerin ve öğretmenlerin lehine anlamlı bir fark görülmüş,tr_TR
dc.language.isotrtr_TR
dc.publisherİSTANBUL AYDIN ÜNİVERSİTESİ SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜtr_TR
dc.subjectMesleki Çalışmatr_TR
dc.subjectMesleki Gelişimtr_TR
dc.subjectSeminertr_TR
dc.subjectHizmet İçi Eğitimtr_TR
dc.subjectÖğretmen Yeterlikleritr_TR
dc.subjectProfessional Trainingtr_TR
dc.subjectProfessional Developmenttr_TR
dc.subjectSeminartr_TR
dc.subjectIn-service Trainingtr_TR
dc.subjectTeacher Qualificationtr_TR
dc.titleMESLEKİ GELİŞİM SEMİNER ÇALIŞMALARININ ÖĞRETMENLER TARAFINDAN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ ÖRNEKLEMİtr_TR
dc.typeThesistr_TR
dc.description.abstractolThe one of the important factor which affects the progress in education was the educated teachers whose education was planned professional training programs including professional qualifications. Today, it is seen that professional programs are far away from effectiveness. The aim of this research was to reveal the opinions of teachers and administrators who worked primary and secondary level in schools about the pre and post seminars at the beginning and at the end of academic years. Also the other aim of the research was to enlighten R&D practices. The universe of this research was the primary and secondary schools in Istanbul. The sample of the research was elementary and middle schools in Bahcelievler. The research method was done with mixed method. The qualitative part was done to evaluate the professional training and to produce questionnaire for survey analysis in quantitative part of the research. The structured interview which was prepared by the researchers was applied to 65 participants. The results of interview were analyzed by content analysis technique. Quantitatively, the data obtained from questionnaire which was "Evaluating Professional Development Seminar Instrument" and it was prepared by the researchers having 0.95 reliability. The questionnaire was applied to 459 participants and analyzed by using values of frequency and percent, mean, t-test, and one-way ANOVA. The result of the research was evaluated in 8 dimensions. In the dimension of relevance, there was more significant difference in favor of teachers working 20 year or more, according to service years variable and it was found that seminars were "not relevant programs." In the dimension of appropriateness of the content, it was seen that content of the seminars was "inadequate and repeating of known-subjects." There was more significant difference in the favor of teachers above 51 years old and principals for the appropriateness of duration dimension and it was seen that duration of the seminars was "inefficient and waste of time. There was more significant difference in the favor of single teachers for the appropriateness of instructor’s dimension. In the appropriateness of methods and techniques dimension, more significant difference in the favor of male teacher was found and it was seen that methods and techniques were "boring, one-sided and based on the theory." More significant difference in the favor of male, single teachers and principals was found for the appropriateness of environment and technical background dimension and it was seen that working environment is far from technology. It was identified that seminars are not suitable for needs of teachers for appropriateness of need dimension. More significant difference in the favor of teachers above 51 years old, teachers who have master degree and principals was found for the relevancy of results dimension and it was found that seminars' results are "far from practice and formality."tr_TR
dc.publisher.firstpagenumber1tr_TR
dc.publisher.lastpagenumber127tr_TR
Appears in Collections:Tezler -- Thesis

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
385691.pdfTez dosyası5 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.