Abstract:
The instruments used by law for the detection of the violations of the intranet and internet and the detection of the violators are insufficient. The instruments used by law to detect IP's for he violations made from cross border are insufficient. The verification of the digital evidences may not be made at most cases. There is a big discrepancy among the applications of the family law, penal code and civil law on the validations of the digital evidences. On the network-based user interfaces, it is quite easy to manipulate the content even without violating intellectual property rights. The hosting providers have a power to manipulate digital evidences. It is possible to record the communications without identified through some hardware's. The data transactions are about to start via blockchain infrastructure in which it is impossible to record the communication, so it will be easy to hide the evidences of the violations and the crimes. The personal data is in a great danger on the web-based applications. In addition to this take it or leave it type contracts are tending to eliminate all the rights on such data. User generated, participate web sites prefer to acquire IP rights of the content created by the users without intervening the disputes and the violations made by a third party. The regulations which covers the rights of the individuals are far to protect legal persons rights. The right of reply may not be granted in the event of the social manipulations and/or lynch. Internet service providers and publishers are not obliged to intervene to the violations unlike the hosting service providers, this passive attitude facilitate DDOS and similar attacks. In the extent of this facts, the legal instruments may be easily manipulated.
